uPVC vs timber fascias and soffits

uPVC has become the default, but painted timber is still the correct answer on some properties. The choice comes down to maintenance appetite and the character of the building.

The case for uPVC

No repainting, no rot, and it stays serviceable for decades with an occasional wash. On standard semis and terraces it's the sensible, low-maintenance default.

The case for timber

On listed properties, and on period frontages with moulded profiles and detailed brackets, timber painted properly looks right in a way that flat plastic board doesn't. It demands repainting on a cycle.

Woodgrain and colour finishes

Modern foiled uPVC in black ash, rosewood or anthracite gets much closer to a painted timber look than white board does, and is a common compromise on character properties.

Ventilation is not optional

Whichever material, the soffit needs continuous or discrete ventilation. Sealing the eaves with solid board is a leading cause of loft condensation.

Cost over time

uPVC costs more up front than repainting once, and far less than repainting every five to seven years for twenty years. Timber's cost is spread out rather than lower.

FAQs

Can uPVC be fitted over sound timber?

Yes — capping over dry, sound timber is a legitimate and cheaper approach. Over rotten timber it is not.

Do uPVC fascias discolour?

White board tends to chalk and dull over many years. Foiled colour finishes generally hold up better than early uPVC did.

Is timber allowed in conservation areas?

Timber is usually the safe option there. Always check with the local authority before changing material on a listed building.

Related reading

More on comparisons and the jobs that usually come with it.

Looking for something specific? See our roofing services, cost guides, common roof problems or the areas we cover.

Get a fast quote

Family-run and Hampton-based. Tell us what you're seeing on the roof and we'll come and look properly before quoting.